
Medical Malpractice Case Chicago
Case Settlement: $3,500,000
Introduction: A kind woman’s husband's medical condition worsened and improved over time. Sometimes he showed symptoms, and sometimes he felt okay. When he had a flare-up, he was taken to Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.
His wife, who was very close to him, always stayed with him and kept detailed notes. Sadly, she saw him die. He was admitted to the hospital with a lung infection and needed fluid removed from his lungs. A new physician assistant was assigned to do the procedure, which involved inserting a needle between his ribs into his lung, guided by imaging called fluoroscopy.
During the procedure, the assistant accidentally cut a major artery, causing the patient to go into shock. He never recovered. He was 63 and working as a dentist when he died. His wife and high school sweetheart watched everything happen.
Challenge: The wife of the victim reached out to the Strom Advisory Group for assistance. Medical malpractice cases are typically complex and emotionally challenging situations. A key difficulty in this case was that several doctors contested the claim, asserting that there was no medical negligence. As a result, the Strom Advisory Group needed to gather compelling evidence and build a strong case to support the victim's position.
Approach: The Strom Advisory Group managed this medical malpractice case comprehensively and methodically. They started by conducting a detailed case review, collecting all relevant facts and evidence. Next, they proceeded with an investigation, which involved gathering medical records and consulting medical experts to evaluate the case thoroughly. Necessary steps also included determining negligence by examining the medical care provided and documenting the damages incurred. Throughout the process, the group engaged in settlement negotiations, and if these efforts failed, they prepared to litigate in court.
Specifically, Neal Strom met multiple times with the spouse to gather key facts and review medical records carefully. He collaborated closely with a reputable law firm based in Chicago and consulted a medical expert to strengthen their position. Although some physicians disagreed and challenged the claim of medical negligence, the Strom Advisory Group successfully built a strong and persuasive case. Additionally, Strom sought advice from a family member who is a physician, which offered valuable insights and guided their strategic decisions. Ultimately, they retained a medical expert to support the case presentation.
Results: In conclusion, the medical malpractice case was settled for $3.5 million after a lengthy and complex litigation process. While the widow faced profound loss and emotional pain from losing her spouse, the Strom Advisory Group was able to help her find some financial stability through this settlement, which may support her as she faces future challenges.
Practice Areas